The will of the voters in primaries counts for 85%. The remaining 15% is decided by the party establishment, such as elected members of the party past and present.
The followers of Bernie Sanders are worried that since a large portion of his supporters are under 30, that advantage won't be reflected in the superdelegate vote. Clinton has them 45:1 vs Sanders right now. Some of his fans want to sue to abolish superdelegates. I googled superdelegates Sanders Clinton and found the first 5 results complaining that they would favor Clinton, who is a Democrat, over Sanders, an independent.
I also found this recent planned lawsuit:
http://ift.tt/1PzJCgq
They want to attack it on the grounds that it violates "one person one vote".
Do you think Superdelegates are good for the country?
The followers of Bernie Sanders are worried that since a large portion of his supporters are under 30, that advantage won't be reflected in the superdelegate vote. Clinton has them 45:1 vs Sanders right now. Some of his fans want to sue to abolish superdelegates. I googled superdelegates Sanders Clinton and found the first 5 results complaining that they would favor Clinton, who is a Democrat, over Sanders, an independent.
I also found this recent planned lawsuit:
http://ift.tt/1PzJCgq
They want to attack it on the grounds that it violates "one person one vote".
Do you think Superdelegates are good for the country?
Are superdelegates good for primaries?